Wyclif’s Latin works

De ecclesia, chapter 13, part 6

The three degrees of clerical heresy

Loserth pp. 294.11–299.8

¶1294.11–295.8

294Ulterius consideret Christi discipulus si ista vocata mundana securitas assecurat altrinsecus elemosinatores ac elemosinatos de accepcione operum misericordie quoad Deum. Nonne ista mundialitas retardat Christi presbiteros, ut ascendant ad speculam scripture in qua possent omnia pericula ecclesie a mundi principio usque in finem premuniendo ecclesiam speculari (ut notat scriptura Jeremie XXXI° et Ezechiel XXXIII°)? Notet secundo si ista copiosa mundana securitas facit istos speculatores sompniferos et ignaros ad ista pericula ecclesie previdendum, illos autem facit timidos ad pericula dampnacionis populi predicendum, et alios qui forent altilia facit reptilia, indispositos ad orandum pro subditorum salute, inter Deum et populum mediando, vel ad merendum sibi et aliis sacramenta ministrando vel evangelium predicando. Unde notaremus parabolam Christi, Luce XII°, ubi precipit cavere ab omni avaricia, quia non in diviciis cuiusquam vita eius est, sicut probat de quodam divite, sollicitante se circa inhorreacionem bonorum suorum, et eadem nocte fuit anima eius rapta per demones. Cogitaremus insuper illud Ezechielis XVI°, 49: Hec fuit iniquitas Sodome, sororis tue, superbia, saturitas panis et habundancia et ocium, que quatuor 295si sint in clero occasione dotacionis, imminet exinde periculum. Si autem occasio sit data vel accepta per accidens ex tali dotacione perpetua, ubi temporalis elemosinacio foret securior, patet periculum tam in elemosinante quam elemosinato isti seculari ritui innitendo. Deus autem necessitat divites huius seculi, ut continue ministrent clero in vite necessariis, quantum de clero est necessarium ecclesie militanti.

Further, let Christ’s disciple consider whether this so-calledvocatus (vocata bona, vocata ecclesia): so-called worldly security assures, on either side, the almsgivers and the almsmenelemosinare; elemosinatus: to give alms to; almsman of the acceptance of their works of mercy as regards God.1 Does not this mundanitymundialitas / secularitas: mundanity / worldliness hold back Christ’s presbyterssacerdos / presbiter: priest / presbyter from climbing to the watchtower of scripture, from which they could watch for all the dangers of the churchecclesia: church, from the beginning of the world to the end, forewarning the church (as scripture notes in Jeremiah 31 and Ezekiel 33)?2 Let him note secondly whether this copious worldly security makes these watchmenspeculator: watchman drowsy and ignorant for foreseeing these dangers of the church, and makes those others fearful of foretelling the dangers of the people’s damnation, and makes others, who would be fatted fowl, creeping things,3 unfitindispositus; (se) indisponere: unfit; to make (oneself) unfit to pray for the salvation of their subjects, mediating between God and the people, or to merit for themselves and others by ministering the sacraments or preaching the gospel. Hence we should note Christ’s parable in Luke 12, where he commands us to beware of all covetousness, because a man’s life is not in his riches, as he proves of a certain rich man who busied himself about storing his goods in barns, and that same night his soul was snatched away by demons.4 We should consider moreover that word of Ezekiel 16:49: "This was the iniquity of Sodom thy sister, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance, and idleness"; and if these four 295are in the clergyclerus; clericus: the clergy; cleric by occasion of endowmentdotacio: endowment, danger hangs over [them] from it.5 And if the occasion is given or taken by accident from such perpetual endowment, where temporary almsgiving would be more secure, the danger is clear both in the almsgiverelemosinans: almsgiver and in the almsman who leans upon this secular rite.6 But God constrains the rich of this world to minister continually to the clergy in the necessaries of life, as much of the clergy as is necessary to the church militantecclesia militans / triumphans / dormiens: the church militant / triumphant / sleeping.

¶2295.9–296.6

295Et patet quod non est securitas domino seculari elemosinam suam taliter impertiri, cum veritas precipit sibi Luce XVI, 9, ut faciat sibi amicos de mammona iniquitatis, non autem spirituales et periculosissimos inimicos. Sed Matthei X, 36, dicit Christus: Inimici eius, domestici eius. Nulli enim plus subdole faciunt scisma in sancta matre ecclesia tamquam magis periculosi heretici quam illi qui videntur esse capitales ecclesie induti vestibus ovium. Unde quamvis tam de laicis quam de clero sint multi heretici, ut patet de tribus personis prescitis que relinquentur in finali iudicio (de quibus Matthei XXIV, 1), periculosior et communior heresis pululat in clero, cuius (ut alias exposui) sunt tres gradus. Primus est quando in clero quis aspirat ad dignitatem ecclesiasticam symoniace pocius propter questum et fastum cum eis sequentibus quam meritorium officium spiritualiter serviendi. De ista heresi loquitur decretum Ia, q. I, sub auctoritate Gregorii sic dicentis: Fertur symoniaca heresis que prima contra ecclesiam Dei diabolica supplantacione surrepsit et in ipso ortu suo zelo apostolice ulcionis percussa atque dampnata est, in regni nostri finibus dominari. 296Tales enim hereticos debet superior in ecclesia et precipue verus Christi vicarius extirpare; omnis enim symoniacus est hereticus (ut patet Iª, q. I. Quisquis). Nec videtur apcior destruccio huius heresis quam tollere proprietatem temporalium gracia cuius est talis dignitas symoniace affectata.

And it is clear that there is no security for a secular lorddominus; dominari: lord; to exercise lordship / to lord it in bestowing his almselemosina: alms in such a way, since the Truth commands him in Luke 16:9 to "make unto [him] friends of the mammon of iniquity," not spiritual and most dangerous enemies. But in Matthew 10:36 Christ says: "His enemies, they of his own household."7 For none make schism in holy mother church more craftily, as more dangerous heretics, than those who seem to be the chief men of the church, clothed in the garments of sheep. Hence, although there are many heretics among the laity as well as among the clergy, as is clear of the three foreknownprescitus, -i: the foreknown persons who will be left at the final judgment (of whom Matthew 24:1), a more dangerous and commoner heresy sprouts in the clergy, of which (as I have set out elsewhere) there are three degrees.8 The first is when someone in the clergy aspires to an ecclesiastical dignity simoniacallysimonia: simony, rather for gain and pomp, with what follows on them, than for the meritorious office of serving spiritually. Of this heresy the Decretum speaks at 1 q. 1, under the authority of Gregory, who says thus: "The simoniac heresy, which first crept in against the church of God by the devil’s supplanting, and at its very birth was struck and condemned by the zeal of apostolic vengeance, is reported to lord itdominus; dominari: lord; to exercise lordship / to lord it within the borders of our kingdom."9 296For such heretics the superior in the church, and especially the true vicar of Christvicarius Christi: vicar of Christ, must root out; for every simoniac is a heretic (as is clear from 1 q. 1, Quisquis).10 Nor does there seem a more apt destruction of this heresy than to take away the ownership of the temporal goodstemporalia: temporal goods for whose sake such dignity is simoniacally desiredaffectare: to desire.

¶3296.7–298.24

296Secundus gradus heresis a prelatis venandus et ab utroque brachio destruendus est, cum persona dotata ecclesie, que debet esse procurator, non dominus elemosinarum datarum pauperibus, ut patet in principio capituli huius et libro III Decretalium, De Donacionibus, cap°: Fraternitatem, cum, inquam, talis expendit bona ecclesie prodigaliter in pompa seculi vel consumit ipsa in cognacione vel affeccione carnali, aut tercio detinet thesaurum pauperum avare affeccione terreni commodi, tunc est periculosus hereticus sed periculosissimus persona conventualis istis condicionibus heresis maculata. Patet ista heresis, ymmo antechristiana vesania ex dicto beati Gregorii posito in decretis XVIª, q. VII, sic dicentis: Pervenit ad nos fama sinistra quod quidam episcoporum non sacerdotibus proprie diocesis decimas atque christianorum oblaciones conferant, sed pocius laicalibus personis, militum videlicet sive servitorum vel ( quod gravius est) eciam consanguineis. Unde si quis amodo episcopus inventus fuerit huius divini precepti transgressor, inter maximos hereticos et pessimos antichristos non minimus habeatur, et sicut Nicena synodus de simoniacis censuit, et qui dat episcopus 297et qui recipiunt ab eo laici, sive pacto sive beneficio, eterni incendii ignibus deputentur. Et multo magis communitas que debet esse religiosior et est in isto peccato pertinacior et antichristus profundior, cuiusmodi forent religiosi, viventes seculariter, distribuentes bona pauperum cognacioni sue, ut fiat mundo inclitus, militaribus atque iuridicis, ut defendant suos redditus, et (quod foret pessimum) si darent cognacioni sue carnalibus et famulis inhabilibus presentacionem ad beneficia ecclesiastica virtute iuris patronatus. Et omnia ista innuit beatus Gregorius. Tercius gradus clericalis heresis est, cum sacerdos occupat statum et bona ecclesie sine hoc quod rependat debitum ministerium ad quod pretextu elemosine et acceptacionis solempnis officii obligatur; talis autem ut sic excommunicatur a domino, quia si laicus excommunicatur ab homine, eo quod iniuste detinet decimas vel elemosinas debitas sacerdoti, multo plus sacerdos excommunicatur a domino qui iniuste post maiorem obligacionem detinet spirituales elemosinas subditorum. Obligacio, inquam, est maior, cum non licet sibi elemosinas spirituales subtrahere eciam subdito subtrahente elemosinas corporales. Sacerdotes enim Christi debent benefacere persequentibus et diligere inimicos, et iterum subtraccio spiritualis elemosine est periculosior, cum minatur perpetuam perdicionem corporis et anime, sed neutrum tam evidenter subtraccio elemosine corporalis. Unde Jeremie XLVIII°, 10 dicitur: Maledictus qui facit opus domini fraudulenter; et multo magis est maledictus qui recipit onus ducatus gregis dominici, quem vel proditorie ducit in precipicium, vel fraudulenter omnino subtrahit ministerium, de quo dictum est libro VI°, 298cap. XX° et tribus sequentibus. Omnis autem excommunicatus eciam rite ab homine est hereticus, et evidencius omnis excommunicatus a Deo. Unde IVª, q. I Quod autem, sub auctoritate secunde synodi Nicolaus papa sic loquitur: Hereticos, inquiunt, dicimus tam eos qui ab ecclesia olim proiecti sunt, quam qui post hec a nobis anathematizati sunt. Porro si adhuc nec sic credatis, audite. Preter hos autem aiunt et eos qui fidem simulant confiteri scismaticos esse et eos qui seorsum a comunicantibus nobis episcopis collectas faciunt. Demum vero, et si quidam ab ecclesia super causis quibusdam reprehensi sunt et proiecti et excommunicati, sive ex clero sive ex laicali ordine. Dicimus omnes huiusmodi hereticos atque scismaticos. Unde glosa dicit ibidem quod omnis excommunicatus est hereticus, et allegat decretum, XXIIIª, q. IVª, Ipsa pietas, et XXIVª, q. III, Illi. Et concordant dicta de heresi libro VI°. Omnis enim vel peccans mortaliter est ut sic divisus a communione sancte matris ecclesie quod sonat hereticus. Item, omnis qui nititur auferre privilegium Romane ecclesie est ut sic hereticus; quod dissipantes legem de sacerdotum officio maxime faciunt in effectu.

The second degree of heresy, to be hunted down by prelatesprelatus: prelate and destroyed by both arms, is when the endowed person of the church, who ought to be the proctorprocurator; procuratrix: proctor, not the lord, of the alms given to the poor (as is clear at the beginning of this chapter and in book III of the Decretals, De donationibus, chapter Fraternitatem) — when, I say, such a one spends the goods of the church prodigally in the pomp of the world, or consumes them on kindred or carnal affection, or thirdly withholds the treasure of the poor through avaricious affection for earthly advantage: then he is a dangerous heretic, but most dangerous is a conventual person stained with these conditions of heresy.11 This heresy, indeed this antichristian madness, is clear from the saying of blessed Gregory placed in the Decretum at 16 q. 7, who says thus: "An ill report has reached us that certain of the bishops confer the tithesdecime; pars decima: tithes; the tenth part and the oblations of christians not on the priestssacerdos / presbiter: priest / presbyter of their own diocese but rather on lay persons, namely knightsmilicia; milites: knighthood; knights or servants, or (what is graver) even on kinsmen. Hence if any bishopepiscopus; dominus episcopus: bishop; the lord bishop henceforth shall be found a transgressor of this divine precept, let him be held not the least among the greatest heretics and worst antichrists; and as the Nicene synod decreed concerning simoniacs, both the bishop who gives 297and the laymen who receive from him, whether by bargain or by favour, are to be assigned to the fires of eternal burning."12 And much more [is] a community [a heretic] which ought to be more religious and is more pertinacious in this sin and a deeper antichrist: such would be the religiousreligiosi: the religious living in a secular manner, distributing the goods of the poor to their kindred, so that it may become renowned to the world, [and] to military men and lawyers, so that they may defend their revenuesreditus: revenue(s), and (what would be worst) if they gave to their carnal kindred and to unqualifiedinhabilis: unqualified (to hold office) servants presentation to ecclesiastical beneficesbeneficium ecclesiasticum: ecclesiastical benefice by virtue of the right of patronageius patronatus: right of patronage.13 And blessed Gregory hints at all these things. The third degree of clerical heresy is when a priest occupies the estate and goods of the church without repaying the due ministry to which he is bound by reason of the alms and of his acceptance of a solemn office; and such a one, as such, is excommunicated by the Lord; for if a layman is excommunicated by man because he unjustly withholds tithes or alms due to the priest, much more is the priest excommunicated by the Lord who unjustly, after a greater obligation, withholds the spiritual alms of his subjects. The obligation, I say, is greater, since it is not lawful for him to withdraw spiritual alms even when the subject withdraws bodily alms. For the priests of Christ must do good to those who persecute [them] and love their enemies; and again, the withdrawal of spiritual alms is more dangerous, since it threatens perpetual perdition of body and soul, but the withdrawal of bodily alms [threatens] neither so evidently.14 Hence it is said in Jeremiah 48:10: "Cursed be he that doth the work of the Lord deceitfully"; and much more cursed is he who receives the burden of leading the Lord’s flock, which he either treacherously leads to the precipice or from which he fraudulently withdraws [his] ministry altogether, of which it was said in book VI, 298chapter 20 and the three following.15 Now everyone excommunicated by man, even duly, is a heretic, and more evidently everyone excommunicated by God. Hence at 4 q. 1, Quod autem, under the authority of the second synod, popepapa: pope Nicholas speaks thus: "'We call heretics,' they say, 'both those who were long ago cast out of the church and those who after this were anathematized by us.' Further, if even so you do not yet believe, hear. 'And besides these,' they say, 'those also who feign to confess the faith are schismatics, and those who hold assemblies apart from the bishops in communion with us. Lastly, also if some have been reproved by the church over certain causes and cast out and excommunicated, whether of the clergy or of the lay order. We call all such heretics and schismatics.'"16 Hence the glossglosa: gloss says there that everyone excommunicated is a heretic, and allegesallegare / allegacio: allege / allegation the Decretum, 23 q. 4, Ipsa pietas, and 24 q. 3, Illi.17 And what was said of heresy in book VI agrees. For everyone [excommunicated], or sinning mortally, is as such divided from the communion of holy mother church, which is what "heretic" signifies.18 Again, everyone who strives to take away the privilegeprivilegium / privilegiare / privilegiacio: privilege / to privilege / privileging of the Roman church is as such a heretic; and those who scatter the law on the office of priests do this most of all in effect.19

¶4298.25–299.8

298Item, tales periuri sunt nedum, quia negant fidem quam Christo promiserant in baptismo, in recepcione sacerdotalis ordinis et in recepcione illius officii, sed iurati sunt specialiter ad defendendum et retinendum (quantum sufficiunt) iura Romane ecclesie et regulas sanctorum patrum (ut patet III° Decretalium De Iure 299Iurando. Ego episcopus). Quod si in isto contra Romanam ecclesiam incurrunt periurium, quomodo non papa primus divideret eos a sua ecclesia cui tam proditorie sic illudunt? Heresis ergo symoniacorum in ingressu non per hostium, in progressu quo prodigaliter consumunt bona pauperum, et maxime in omissione debiti officii curatorum videtur inficere tam ecclesiam quam Romanum imperium.

Again, such men are perjurers,20 not only because they deny the faith which they had promised to Christ in baptism, in receiving the priestly order and in receiving that office, but [because] they are specially sworn to defend and retain (as far as they are able) the rightsius: right / law of the Roman church and the rules of the holy fathers (as is clear from book III of the Decretals, De iure 299iurando, Ego episcopus).21 And if in this they incur perjury against the Roman church, how would the pope not be the first to divide them from his church, which they so treacherously mock? The heresy of simoniacs, therefore — in their entry, not by the door; in their progress, in which they prodigally consume the goods of the poor; and above all in the omission of the due office of curatescuratus: curate — seems to infect both the church and the Roman empire.22

Notes

  1. 1 Elemosinatores, "almsgivers", paired with elemosinatos, "those given alms" (294.12). A in marg. (294.11): Nota bonas consideraciones. Nota contra securitatem dotacionis.
  2. 2 Watchmen: Jer. 31:6 (custodes) and Ezek. 33:2–7 (speculatorem dedi te, 33:7); Wyclif gives chapters only. Retardat … ut ascendant: "holds back [them] so that they [do not] climb"; the sense is a hindrance.
  3. 3 Altilia are fatted fowl (Matt. 22:4, "my fatlings"); set against reptilia the word seems to mean birds that fly (cf. volatilia), the clergy who should rise in contemplation. Translated as printed.
  4. 4 Luke 12:15–20 paraphrased (Vulgate non in abundantia cujusquam vita ejus est ex his quae possidet); "snatched by demons" is Wyclif’s gloss on 12:20 (animam tuam repetunt a te).
  5. 5 Ezek. 16:49, cut after otium (Vulgate adds ipsius et filiarum ejus); the four are pride, fulness of bread, abundance and idleness.
  6. 6 Temporalis elemosinacio: almsgiving from time to time, against perpetual endowment ("temporary", as the glossary elemosina temporalis).
  7. 7 Matt. 10:36: Vulgate inimici hominis, Wyclif inimici eius. The sheep’s garments recall Matt. 7:15. Capitales ecclesie: "the chief men", kept apart from caput.
  8. 8 Matthei XXIV, 1 (A A₁ omit XXIV): verse 1 does not fit. The three left behind are in the field and at the mill (Matt. 24:40–41) and in bed (Luke 17:34); the reference is translated as printed.
  9. 9 Decretum C. 1 q. 1 c. 28 (Fertur), Gregory I: Loserth (295.28), modern form ours. Dominari here is pejorative.
  10. 10 Decretum C. 1 q. 1 c. 5 (Quisquis): Loserth (296.3), modern form ours.
  11. 11 Decretals X 3.24.2 (Fraternitatem): Loserth (296.11), modern form ours. Utroque brachio: the spiritual and the secular arm. Persona conventualis: a religious house as a corporate person.
  12. 12 Decretum C. 16 q. 7 c. 3 (cf. C. 1 q. 3 c. 13). Loserth (296.19): the canon is not of Gregory I but of Gregory VII, and Hus took over the error. The Decretum reads sive precio sive beneficio (Loserth, 297.1) where Wyclif has sive pacto.
  13. 13 The period has no main verb: "[is a heretic]" is understood from the preceding sentences; ut fiat mundo inclitus has no expressed subject (the community, or each member). A A₁ omit pertinacior … viventes and read particulariter distribuentes (297.4–5).
  14. 14 Matt. 5:44 ("do good to them that hate you … pray for them that persecute"), paraphrased.
  15. 15 Libro VI°, cap. XX et tribus sequentibus: Wyclif’s cross-reference to another book of his Summa; which work is meant is not identified; also libro VI° below.
  16. 16 Decretum C. 4 q. 1 c. 2 (Quod autem), Nicholas I citing the second synod (of Constantinople): Loserth (298.3–4), modern form ours. Inquiunt is Loserth’s correction from the canon (A A₁ inquam, B inquit); the Decretum reads audite quod subditur; B dicamus omnes (298.14). The clause Demum … ordine stands incomplete as quoted.
  17. 17 The ordinary gloss on C. 4 q. 1 c. 2, and its allegations C. 23 q. 4 c. 24 (Ipsa pietas) and C. 24 q. 3 c. 25 (Illi): the gloss, v. ab ecclesia, reads Not. quod omnis excommunicatus dicitur hereticus, ut j. 23 q. 4 ipsa pietas (glossed Decretum, 1588), with no allegation of Illi.
  18. 18 Omnis enim vel peccans lacks the first member of vel; "[excommunicated]" is supplied from the argument (alternatively vel = "even": "everyone, even [one] sinning mortally"). Quod sonat hereticus: heresy as division (from haeresis, sect).
  19. 19 The privilege of the Roman church: cf. Decretum D. 22 c. 1 (Omnes, Nicholas II: who takes away the Roman church’s privilege falls into heresy), § 1, qui autem Romanae ecclesiae priuilegium … auferre conatur, hic proculdubio in heresim labitur (Friedberg I, 73–74; PL 187:122C).
  20. 20 Periuri (298.25): read on the plate, where the OCR gave penun.
  21. 21 Decretals X 2.24.4 (Ego episcopus, the bishop’s oath to the Roman church): Loserth (298.30) gives book II; Wyclif says III. Nedum … sed: "not only … but".
  22. 22 Non per hostium: John 10:1 ("He that entereth not by the door"). After imperium A adds Myly Czechowe, "Dear Czechs" (Loserth 299.8), a Bohemian copyist’s address.
How the Latin of this chapter was established
  • Plate readings; page · reading · note):
    • 294: ad (20 is the line number)
    • 295: ∅ (170c is a folio mark)
    • 295: 1 (x-height old-style 1)
    • 295: zelo (italic z clear) [NW]
    • 296: Christi
    • 296: Iª
    • 296: diocesis [NW]
    • 297: ∅) [GAP]
    • 297: gradus
    • 297: ut sic (main token covers 170d ut * sic; folio mark and * dropped)
    • 298: excommunicatus (ex-/communicatus; main token holds whole word)
    • 298: ∅ (print ex-/communicatus; main already holds excommunicatus whole at pos 7)
    • 298: IVª
    • 298: XXIIIª
    • 298: IVª
    • 298: officio
    • 298: in
    • 298: effectu
    • 298: fidem (25 is the line number)
    • 298: Christo
    • 299: Iurando (italic capital I; 170d folio mark)
    • 294: ocium
    • 296: enim
    • 298: III° (degree sign visible)
    • 294: superbia, (4 is a margin numeral) [-MARK]
    • 294: quatuor (qua- at foot of p.294, tuor at head of p.295 (leaf n0332); output token holds both) [-MARK]
    • 294: XII°, (no verse; the 3 at line end is a margin numeral) [-VERSE]
    • 297: recipiunt (print: et qui recipiunt ab eo (plate, agent 6); the other scans aligned p.296 dat here)