Wyclif’s Latin works

De ecclesia, chapter 18, part 5

The betrayers of the truth; whether the church is properly virgin, mother and bride

Loserth pp. 431.1–435.25

¶1431.1–433.23

431Non debui sic dixisse; sed ecce domino contigit: dixit et perdidit multos; solacium itaque in domino habeamus et tamen caute verba dicamus. Non dicit omnimode taceamus vel veritatem dicentibus resistamus, quia revera sic prodere sermonem Dei, qui est veritas et lex Christi, foret ipsum prodere, cum sit idem. Unde videtur quod nostri pretensi de parte dextera sponse Christi qui sic produnt veritatem in membris suis habent racionem maioritatis peccati super ambos proditores Christi tam novi quam veteris testamenti. Nam plura beneficia tam corporalia quam spiritualia a Christo receperant, maiorem veritatis noticiam tam ex lege Christi quam ex factis suis habuerant. Et ideo racione maioris ingratitudinis et peccandi sciencie videtur, si fuerint in maiori gracia secundum presentem iusticiam, quod maiorem culpam incurrant; et istam materiam tangit beatus Gregorius, Omelia XVIIIª super illud Johannis VIII°, 46: Si veritatem dico, quare non creditis mihi? Multi, inquit, sunt hodie qui Judeorum duriciam detestantur, quia predicacionem domini audire noluerant et tamen quales illos arguunt fuisse ad fidem, tales ipsi sunt ad operacionem. Precepta Dei audiunt, miracula cognoscunt, sed converti a pravitatibus suis renuunt. Ad decimam raciunculam respondetur, concedendo quod ecclesia est virgo. Et allegantur ad hoc decreta ecclesie, et sic dicitur iuvenescere, senescere, et multa alia predicata suscipit quorum racionem oportet distinguere; alia, inquit, dicuntur proprie de ecclesia, ut quod habet temporalia, privilegia et regulam vivendi, alia autem dicuntur de ecclesia improprie, methaforice et 432transsumptive, ut quod ecclesia sit virgo, vetula, sponsa et mater cum denominacionibus huiusmodi. Omnia ista dicuntur de ecclesia transsumptive, mistice et improprie. Inprimis suppono quod sequitur: Ecclesia est improprie virgo, mater, sponsa Christi etc., ergo ipsa est ecclesia, est virgo, mater et sponsa Christi. Patet tripliciter: Primo ex hoc quod doctor sepe concedit huiusmodi proposiciones simpliciter; secundo ex hoc quod aliter non satisfaceret alicui tali proposicioni, dicendo utrum debet concedi simpliciter vel negari. Si enim iste terminus improprie sit terminus distrahens, tunc negaretur maior pars dictorum sanctorum de ecclesia et maior pars scripture sacre ac modi loquendi, que tamen bene concessa sunt. Scribit enim Augustinus in De Verbis Domini super Joh., Sermone L°, ecclesie: Concessit Christus in spiritu quod mater eius habuit in corpore, ut et mater et virgo sit. Et hoc est proprium Deo nostro, ut de corrupta possit facere virginem, sicut homo contra de virgine facit corruptam, dicente Jeronimo, libro primo, super illo Osee II°, 19: Sponsabo te mihi in sempiternum et sponsabo te in iusticia et iudicio et misericordia et miseracionibus et sponsabo te mihi in fide. Super quo sic loquitur sanctus doctor: O quanta clemencia Dei, meretrix que cum multis amatoribus fornicata est et ob hoc crimen bestiis tradita, postquam revertitur ad virum, nequaquam ei reconciliari dicitur sed desponderi. Et vide quid sit inter Dei coniunccionem et hominum; homo cum uxorem acceperit, de virgine mulierem facit, id est, non virginem; Deus autem meretricibus copulatus 433eas mutat in virgines iuxta illud, quod adultere dicitur per Jeremiam: Non ut dominum me invocasti aut patrem aut principem virginitatis tue. Unde et Apostolus post fornicacionem et ydolorum cultum credentibus Corinthiis loquitur: Despondi vos uni viro virginem castam exhibere Christo. Et post exponit Jeronimus quare Deus desponsacionem ecclesie tripliciter repeciit: Primo, inquit, despondit eam in Abraham sive in Egipto, ut uxorem habeat sempiternam. Secundo in monte Synay, dans ei in sponsalibus legis iusticiam. Et tercio veniente Dei filio domino Jesu Christo fuit desponsata in fide perfecta, dum videndo filium vidit et patrem, Johannis XIV°, 10, 11. Sic ergo sancti doctores concedentes ista simpliciter non sunt ausi asserere quod auctor scripture dicit ista improprie et false. Sed videtur mihi quod doctor loquitur improprie vocando ecclesiam vetulam vel post eius incepcionem dicendo ipsam iuvenescere. Non enim memini me legisse ista de sancta matre ecclesia, sed synagoga sathane, ecclesia malignancium et meretrix cuius dyabolus est caput, quam doctor dicit partem sancte matris ecclesie, potest racionabiliter dici vetula turpissima.

"I ought not to have spoken so; but behold, it happened to the Lord: he spoke and lost many. Let us therefore have comfort in the Lord, and yet speak words with caution."1 He does not say: let us altogether keep silent, or resist those who speak the truth; because truly so to betray the word of God, which is truth and the law of Christlex dei / lex Christi / lex evangelica: God's law / the law of Christ / the gospel law, would be to betray him, since it is the same. Whence it seems that those of ours who pretend to be of the right side of the bridesponsa / sponsus: bride / bridegroom of Christ, who so betray the truth in his members, have a ground of greatnessprioritas; majoritas: priority; greatness of sin over both betrayers of Christ, of the new as well as of the old testament. For they had received more benefits, bodily as well as spiritual, from Christ, [and] had had a greater knowledge of the truth, as well from the law of Christ as from his deeds. And therefore, by reason of greater ingratitudeingratitudo: ingratitude and knowledge in sinning, it seems, if they were in greater grace according to present justicesecundum presentem iusticiam: according to present justice, that they incur greater guilt;2 and blessed Gregory touches this matter, homily 18, on that text of John 8:46, "If I say the truth, why do you not believe me?" "There are many today," he says, "who detest the hardness of the Jews, because they would not hear the preaching of the Lord; and yet such as they accuse them of having been toward faith, such are they themselves toward works. They hear the precepts of God, they know his miracles, but they refuse to be converted from their depravities."3 To the tenth little argumentraciuncula: little argument the reply isrespondetur: the reply is by granting that the churchecclesia: church is a virgin. And the decrees of the church are allegedallegare / allegacio: allege / allegation for this; and so it is said to grow young, to grow old, and it takes many other predicates whose ground must be distinguished: "some," he says, "are said properly of the church, as that it has temporal goodstemporalia: temporal goods, privilegesprivilegium / privilegiare / privilegiacio: privilege / to privilege / privileging and a rule of living; but others are said of the church improperly, metaphorically and 432transumptively, as that the church is a virgin, an old woman, a bride and a mother, with namingsdenominacio; denominare: naming; to name of this kind. All these are said of the church transumptively, mystically and improperly."4 First, I suppose that it followssequitur: it follows: the church is improperly virgin, mother, bride of Christ, etc.; therefore she, the church, is virgin, mother and bride of Christ. This is clear in three ways: first from this, that the doctor often grants such propositions without qualificationsimpliciter / secundum quid: without qualification / in a certain respect; secondly from this, that otherwise he would not satisfy any such proposition by saying whether it ought to be granted without qualification or denied. For if this term "improperly" is a diminishing qualifierdistrahens: diminishing qualifier, then the greater part of the sayings of the saints about the church, and the greater part of holy scripture and of its manners of speaking, would be denied, which are nevertheless well granted.5 For Augustine writes in On the Words of the Lord, on John, sermon 50: "To the church Christ granted in spirit what his mother had in body, that she should be both mother and virgin. And this is proper to our God, that he can make a virgin out of one corrupted, as man on the contrary makes one corrupted out of a virgin";6 as Jerome says, book 1, on that text of Hosea 2:19: "I will espouse thee to me for ever: and I will espouse thee in justice, and judgment, and mercy, and commiserations; and I will espouse thee to me in faith." On which the holy doctor speaks thus: "O how great the clemency of God! The harlot who has fornicated with many lovers, and for this crime was handed over to the beasts, after she returns to her husband is by no means said to be reconciled to him, but betrothed. And see what [difference] there is between the union of God and that of men: a man, when he has taken a wife, makes of a virgin a woman, that is, not a virgin; but God, joined to harlots, 433changes them into virgins, according to that which is said to the adulteress through Jeremiah: You have not called upon me as lord, or father, or prince of your virginity. Whence the Apostle too speaks to the Corinthians, who believed after fornication and the worship of idols: I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ."7 And afterwards Jerome expounds why God repeated the betrothal of the church three times: "First," he says, "he betrothed her in Abraham or in Egypt, that he might have an everlasting wife. Secondly on Mount Sinai, giving her the justice of the law as betrothal gifts. And thirdly, at the coming of the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, she was betrothed in perfect faith," when in seeing the Son she saw the Father too, John 14:10–11.8 So, therefore, the holy doctors, granting these things without qualification, did not dare to assert that the author of scripture says them improperly and falsely. But it seems to me that the doctor speaks improperly in calling the church an old woman, or in saying that after her beginning she grows young. For I do not remember having read these things of holy mother church; but the synagogue of Satan, the church of the malignant and the harlot whose head is the devil, which the doctor calls a part of holy mother church, can reasonably be called a most foul old woman.9

¶2433.24–435.25

433Ponit enim doctor quod prescitus eciam dum fuerit in mortali, si habuerit fidem infusam, est membrum sancte matris ecclesie, et indubie tunc est membrum sathane et dyabolus caput eius (ut dicit beatus Gregorius). Dicitur autem sancta mater ecclesia proprie senescere et florere virtutibus, cum Psalmo XCI°, 11, sic loquitur propheta: Senectus mea in misericordia uberi; nam in tercia desponsacione quando sponsa Christi est mulier antiqua et tamquam senex persecucionibus membrorum diaboli tribulata, habet uberiorem 434misericordiam quam in tempore sue adolescencie, et sic vere vocatur vidua propter elongacionem sponsi ab ea peregrinante ad patriam, dum Psalmo CXXXI°, 15, dicit sponsus: Viduam eius benedicens benedicam. Ulterius foret opus doctole detegere quid proprie et quid improprie ac figurative conveniat sancte matri ecclesie, quia nimis suspectum verbum et carnale est dicere quod ecclesia proprie habet possessiones et privilegia Constantini, sed improprie est mater vel sponsa Christi. Primo (inquam) querendum esset quid proprie foret ecclesia, si aliquid; non superest quid foret nisi substancia, et ulterius descendendo (ut sepe tetigi) oporteret concedere quod ecclesia sit substancia corporea et sic corpus animatum racionabile, et sic proprie foret homo, et per consequens desponsanda. Confirmatur, ecclesia est proprie privilegiata et possessionata (ut dicitur); quod non foret nisi posset uti privilegiis et vesci possessionibus. Ergo ecclesia posset comedere et actus humanos consimiles exercere, et per consequens ecclesia foret substancia animata que generaret omnem hominem, et sic cum foret individuum eiusdem speciei specialissime cum omni homine univoce generans hominem, foret homo (ut sepe dicunt sancti). Et certum est quod improprie foret homo, cum haberet propriam individuacionem, propriam racionabilitatem et propriissimam perfeccionem humanam; nam nisi foret substancia, potens exercere actus racionales, ut actus promerendi, contemplandi et gaudendi, aliter indignius quam sacerdotes Baal comederet tantum cibum. Si dicitur quod ecclesia proprie nichil est sed est aliqua, tunc concedendum foret simpliciter quod ecclesia nichil est. Si enim illa simpliciter conceduntur 435de ecclesia que improprie sibi conveniunt, multo magis forent predicata de ecclesia simpliciter concedenda que proprie sibi conveniunt. Si ergo proprie sit nichil, sequitur simpliciter quod sit nichil, et per consequens non est aliquid, et tunc non haberet partem qualitativam aut quantitativam, sicut concedetur, et per consequens nulla denominacio partis foret sibi proprie vere et proprie attributa. Ex quo sequitur quod ecclesia catholica non sit cesaree privilegiata nec seculariter possessionata, quia non secundum se totam (tum quia est indivisibilis, tum eciam quia multis de ecclesia non convenit hoc privilegium vel ista dotacio) nec eciam secundum partem que foret pars illius ecclesie, eo quod spiritus beati qui sunt de illa ecclesia sunt indivisibiles; et sic ecclesia non haberet partem vel partes, et per consequens papa non foret proprie caput ecclesie, cum ipsa proprie semper foret acephala, quia gens sine capite. Caput enim non proprie dicitur nisi in comparacione ad corpus capitatum, sed ecclesia (ut dicitur) non proprie est corpus, quia sic proprie foret homo, ergo non est proprie capitata; et cum proprie est, sequitur quod sit proprie incapitata, et per consequens est incapitata, et per idem quelibet abbathia sive religio non foret proprie antiqua vel iuvenis,

For the doctor lays it down that a foreknownprescitus, -i: the foreknown [man], even while he is in mortal [sin], if he has infused faith, is a membermembrum: member of holy mother church; and undoubtedly he is then a member of Satan, and the devil is his headcaput: head (as blessed Gregory says).10 And holy mother church is said properly to grow old and to flourish in virtues, since in Psalm 91:11 the prophet speaks thus: "my old age in plentiful mercy"; for in the third betrothal, when the bridesponsa / sponsus: bride / bridegroom of Christ is an ancient woman and, like an old woman, troubled by the persecutions of the members of the devil, she has more plentiful 434mercy than in the time of her youth; and so she is truly called a widow, because of the bridegroom’s distance from her as she journeys as a pilgrimpars peregrinans; peregrinari: the pilgrim part; to be a pilgrim to the homelandvia / patria: the way / the homeland, since in Psalm 131:15 the bridegroom says: "Blessing I will bless her widow."11 Further, it would be work for the doctor to exposedetegere: to expose what properly and what improperly and figuratively befits holy mother church, because it is a word too suspect and carnal to say that the church properly has possessions and the privileges of Constantine, but improperly is mother or bride of Christ.12 First (I say) it would have to be asked what the church would properly be, if anything; nothing remains that it could be but a substance; and descending further (as I have often touched on) one would have to grant that the church is a corporeal substance, and so an ensouled rational body, and so it would properly be a man, and consequently [one] to be espoused. It is confirmed: the church is properly privileged and possessioned (as is said); which would not be unless it could use privileges and feed on possessions. Therefore the church could eat and exercise like human acts, and consequently the church would be an ensouled substance which would generate every man; and so, since it would be an individual of the same most special speciesspecies specialissima: most special species as every man, univocally generating man, it would be a man (as the saints often say).13 And it is certain that it would improperly be a man, since it would have its own individuation, its own rationality and its most proper human perfection; for unless it were a substance able to exercise rational acts, such as acts of meriting, contemplating and rejoicing, it would otherwise eat so much food more unworthily than the priests of Baal.14 If it is said that the church properly is nothing but is some things, then it would have to be granted without qualificationsimpliciter / secundum quid: without qualification / in a certain respect that the church is nothing. For if those things which befit it improperly are granted without qualification 435of the church, much more would the predicates which befit it properly have to be granted of the church without qualification. If therefore properly it is nothing, it followssequitur: it follows without qualification that it is nothing, and consequently it is not something; and then it would not have a qualitative or a quantitative partpars quantitativa: quantitative part, as will be granted, and consequently no namingdenominacio; denominare: naming; to name of a part would be properly, truly and properly attributed to it.15 From which it follows that the catholic church is not privileged in caesarean fashion nor possessioned in secular fashion: not according to itself as a whole (both because it is indivisible, and also because this privilege or that endowmentdotacio: endowment does not befit many of the church), nor yet according to a part which would be a part of that church, since the blessed spirits who are of that church are indivisible; and so the church would not have a part or parts, and consequently the popepapa: pope would not properly be head of the church, since she would always properly be acephalous, as a people without a head.16 For "head" is not properly said except in comparison to a headedcapitari / capitatus: to be headed / headed body; now the church (as is said) is not properly a body, because so it would properly be a man; therefore it is not properly headed; and since it properly is [so], it follows that it is properly unheaded, and consequently it is unheaded; and by the same token any abbey or religious order would not properly be old or young,17

Notes

  1. 1 Augustine, Tractatus in Iohannem 27, continued from 430.25–28 (Loserth: Opp. III, ii, p. 505). C. Non dicit: Augustine does not say.
  2. 2 Nostri pretensi de parte dextera sponse Christi: those among us who claim to stand on the right side of Christ’s bride. Ambos proditores ... tam novi quam veteris testamenti: the betrayer of the new testament (Iscariot) and of the old (the priests of the temple). Majoritas peccati: "greatness of sin". T. At 431.8 AA₁ read perdunt; at 431.14, peccandi scire.
  3. 3 Gregory, Homiliae in Evangelia 1.18.5 (Loserth: XL Homil. in Evang. lib. I, hom. XVIII, 5). John 8:46: Wyclif omits vobis (DR "If I say the truth to you"). R. A in the margin at 431.17: Gregorius.
  4. 4 The doctor’s answer to the tenth argument, reported and then quoted (inquit). Racionem oportet distinguere: their ground (whether proper or improper) must be distinguished. Transsumptive: by transferred sense, metaphorically. R. A in the margin at 431.25: Quinta responsio. Ecclesia est virgo, mater, vetula et sponsa etc. Loserth compares p. 115.23. T. At 432.2 B reads huius. Omnia.
  5. 5 Ergo ipsa est ecclesia, est virgo: so printed, with the verb twice; taken as "she, the church, is virgin". Patet tripliciter: two grounds are numbered; the third may be the authorities that follow. Iste terminus improprie: the adverb "improperly" as a term; if it diminished what it qualifies, the scriptural names would be denied. T. At 432.7 B reads concedit huius.
  6. 6 Ecclesie, printed after Sermone L°, is taken as the dative with concessit, "to the church Christ granted". S. Augustine, De verbis Domini, sermon 50 of the old collection (Loserth: Aug. Opp. V, p. 675): the words are in Sermon 138.9 (PL 38), Ecclesiae concessit Christus in spiritu, quod mater ejus habuit in corpore, ut et mater et virgo sit. The next sentence, on making a virgin of the corrupt, is not found there.
  7. 7 Jerome, Commentarii in Osee 1, on 2:19–20 (Loserth: Opp. VI (ed. Migne) 881). Hosea 2:19–20: Wyclif omits the second mihi and the in before misericordia. Jeremiah 3:4 in Jerome’s form (Vulgate voca me: Pater meus, dux virginitatis meae tu es; DR "Thou art my father, the guide of my virginity"). 2 Corinthians 11:2. T. At 432.28 the manuscripts read coniunctos and at 433.1 adulteris; Loserth corrects both from Jerome’s text, and his corrections are translated. At 433.2 B reads non dominum. R. A in the margin at 432.21: Christi desponsacio facit ex meretrice virginem.
  8. 8 The quotation is taken to end at perfecta; dum videndo filium vidit et patrem is Wyclif’s gloss. S. John 14:9–11 (DR 14:9 "he that seeth me seeth the Father also"). T. At 433.11 B reads Sed tercio.
  9. 9 Apocalypse 2:9; Psalm 25:5 (DR "the assembly of the malignant"). C. Vetula: "old woman", the doctor’s word, which Wyclif allows only to the church of the wicked.
  10. 10 In mortali: in mortal [sin]. Prescitus: one God foreknows will be damned (the glossary). S. Gregory as cited at 424.13–17, Hom. in Evang. 1.16.1 (our identification, confirmed: iniquorum omnium caput diabolus est). T. At 433.27 B reads ut dum beatus. R. A in the margin at 433.24: Opinio; at 433.25: Quomodo ecclesia est vetula, vidua et virgo.
  11. 11 Psalm 91:11; Psalm 131:15. C. Ab ea peregrinante: peregrinante is taken with ea, the church on pilgrimage; Christ’s distance from her makes her a widow. T. At 434.3 B reads peregrinantem.
  12. 12 Verbum ... carnale: a carnal way of speaking, putting the church’s possessions first and its scriptural names second. T. At 434.5 A₁ reads doctorem.
  13. 13 Corpus animatum racionabile: the definition of man again (423.27). Desponsanda: "to be espoused", as a woman is. Univoce generans hominem: generating man in the same sense as man generates man. T. At 434.16 AA₁ omit et; at 434.19 B reads humanos sensibiles; at 434.21–22, foret iudicium.
  14. 14 At 434.25 the manuscripts read risibilitatem, "risibility", the property of man; Loserth’s racionabilitatem is translated. C. Improprie foret homo: so printed; the argument seems to want proprie, and the print is translated. Aliter repeats the condition of nisi. S. The priests of Bel, Daniel 14:2–21.
  15. 15 Est aliqua: "is some things" (neuter plural), the escape that the church is not one thing. Sicut concedetur: as [the doctor] will grant. Proprie vere et proprie: proprie twice, as printed. T. At 434.32 B reads Si est illa; at 435.3–4, Si ergo sit proprie, sequitur. R. A in the margin at 434.30: Responsio quedam. Nota si ecclesia est proprie corpus et que predicata sibi proprie conveniant.
  16. 16 Cesaree privilegiata: privileged as the caesarean church is (glossary: ecclesia cesarea). Acephala: headless. T. At 435.10 AA₁ read cesarea, B cesarie.
  17. 17 Et cum proprie est: as printed the clause has no complement; taken as "since it properly is [so]", that is, properly not a body; a word may be lost. Abbathia sive religio: any abbey or order, a corporation like the church; the sentence runs on into 435.26.
How the Latin of this chapter was established
  • Plate readings; page · reading · note):
    • 431: sit idem (main token covers two printed words)
    • 431: Unde
    • 431: Christi (line number 10 glued)
    • 431: XVIIIª
    • 431: alia
    • 432: II°
    • 432: O
    • 433: eas (folio mark 188ᶜ glued)
    • 433: 10
    • 433: 11
    • 433: 11
    • 433: Christi
    • 434: proprie (alinea letter Q glued)
    • 434: ut
    • 434: foret