Wyclif’s Latin works

De ecclesia, chapter 8, part 2

A lying God would deceive the whole church; the oath before the king’s council; the midwives of Exodus

Loserth pp. 160.25–163.27

¶1160.25–162.5

160Nec dubium quin non sit dare virtutem in homine, quin eius ydea vel exemplar sit in Deo et Deus virtute supra genus est taliter virtuosus, ut non posset exemplare iusticiam, misericordiam, patienciam, liberalitatem, et sic de et aliis, nisi ipse foret summe iustus, misericors, paciens et liberalis, et sic de principiis cuiuscunque generis virtutis. Et sic antecedenter ad virtutem mendacii 161oportet Deum esse summe mendacem. Non enim est fingendum quomodo pertinencius denominaret habitus mendacii subiectum suum quam mendax, cum mentiri sit opus virtutis. Item, suppono ex fide scripture quod Deus dicit quicquid creatura aliqua bene dicit; patet ex hoc quod omnis creatura ut sic est organum Dei principalius dicentis quam sua fistula, iuxta modum loquendi Psalmi LXXXIV, 9: Audiam quid loquatur in me dominus Deus. Et Apostolus IIª, Corinthiorum XIII°, 3: An experimentum queritis eius qui in me loquitur Christus. Ex quibus cum veris sequitur quod tam trinitas quam Christus humanitus facit in omni christiano mendace quodcunque mendacium virtuosum, et cum virtuosum non sit distrahens sed pocius viciosum, sequitur quod Deus simpliciter facit mendacium, et cum dicit falsum eadem intencione qua christianus pie menciens, sequitur quod Deus principalissime mentitur et per consequens mendax est, ut pater eius, ut Christus dicit Johannis VIII°, 44 de ipso diabolo. Cum enim Deus illo modo mendacium loquitur, ex propriis loquitur, cum sit fons et origo mendacii, et ita cum dicit angelis veritatem in verbo, nobis menciendo foret duplex animo, et forent in eo est et non contra Apostolum IIª, Cor. 1°, 17. Ymo, cum ipse sit omnis veritas, negando veritatem virtute mendacii, se ipsum negare posset, contra Apostolum IIª Thymotei II°, 13, et foret racione mendacis principii cateclismus tocius fidei christiane. Cum enim Deus mentiri potest iuxta sic opinantes nec potest habere denominacionem virtutis, nisi habeat ipsam in summo et quodam modo infinite, sequitur ex infinitate sue mendacitatis immense quod in tota fide sue scripture potuit totam ecclesiam decepisse 162dolose. Aliter enim esset dare finem sue mendacitatis immense, usque ad quem et non ultra potuit decepisse; quod credo non dabitur, cum dicitur communiter quod sit infinitum misericors sed finite solum modo miserator.

Nor is there doubt that no virtue is to be found in man whose idea or exemplar is not in God; and God, by a virtue above every genus, is so virtuous that he could not be the exemplar of justice, mercy, patience, liberality, and so of the others, unless he were himself supremely just, merciful, patient and liberal; and so of the principles of every genus of virtue.1 And so, antecedently to the virtue of lying, 161God must be supremely a liar. For it is not to be imagined how the habit of lying would more fittingly denominate its subject than as "liar", since to lie would be a work of virtue. Again, I suppose from the faithex fide: as faith teaches; with a genitive, from the faith of [scripture] of scripture that God says whatever any creature says well. This is clear from the fact that every creature, as such, is the instrument of God, who speaks more principally than his pipe, according to the manner of speaking of Psalm 84:9: "I will hear what the Lord God will speak in me"; and the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 13:3: "Do you seek a proof of Christ that speaketh in me?"2 From which, together with true [premisses], it followssequitur: it follows that both the Trinity and Christ in his humanity make, in every Christian liar, whatever virtuous lie [he tells]; and since "virtuous" is not a diminishing qualifierdistrahens: diminishing qualifier, but rather "vicious" is, it follows that God makes a lie without qualificationsimpliciter / secundum quid: without qualification / in a certain respect; and since he says what is false with the same intention as the Christian who lies piously, it follows that God lies most principally, and consequently is "a liar, and the father thereof", as Christ says of the devil himself, John 8:44.3 For when God speaks a lie in that way, "he speaketh of his own", since he is the fount and origin of lying; and so, when he tells the angels the truth in the Word, by lying to us he would be double-minded, and there would be in him "It is, and It is not", against the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 1:17. Indeed, since he himself is all truth, by denying the truth by virtue of lying he could deny himself, against the Apostle, 2 Timothy 2:13 ("he cannot deny himself"); and there would be, by reason of a lying principle, a cataclysm of the whole Christian faith.4 For since, according to those who hold this opinion, God can lie, and cannot have the denomination of a virtue unless he has it in the highest degree and in a certain way infinitely, it follows from the infinity of his immense mendacity that in the whole faith of his scripture he could have deceived the whole churchecclesia: church 162guilefully. For otherwise an end would have to be assigned to his immense mendacity, up to which and not beyond he could have deceived; which I believe will not be granted, since it is commonly said that he is infinitely merciful, but only finitely one who shows mercy.5

¶2162.6–163.27

162Quantum ad illas duas evidencias quod debuissemus mentiri contra iuramentum nostrum tam pium atque legitimum coram consilio regis nostri, Deum contestor et numina quod inter omnes doctrinas vel consilia que audivi non occurrit mihi aliquod difficilius aut detestabilius. Ideo videtur mihi quod minus male potuit fuisse dictum ad partem quam publice sic in scolis, nam sic menciens manifeste incurrisset periurium et infamiam quam vitabat, et ita conclusisset culpabiliter, secundum metam redargucionis maxime sibi ipsi. Ideo minus malum est sine dampno anime pacienter pati detracciones et scandala, quam menciendo et per consequens iniuriando toti universitati create, offendere dominum veritatis. Non enim ymaginari potest casus nec inveniri ficticia in quo vel qua licitum est mentiri, immo crescente mendacio eciam in clero plus solito esset opus doctoris proferre de thesauro scripture raciones et sanctorum testimonia in detestacionem mendacii et non fovere mendacium mendaciis allegacionum et sophisticis argumentis. Ego quippe horrerem introducere scolam istam tamquam doctor mendacii, cum ex fragilitate nimis proni sumus ad hoc sine abduccione peregrina per scienciam menciendi; doctor itaque, docens quod licitum est mentiri, inperfecte procedit, nisi doceat quomodo licitum est mentiri, et per consequens, nisi doceat quomodo debemus mentiri, et sic secundum scolam mendacii foret laudabile mentiri fingendo false doctores extraneos 163et dicta sanctorum doctorum pro ista sentencia coloranda. Sed quis crederet tali scole: Et dico mendaciis allegacionum, quia allegatum est contra me dictum Augustini, super illo Psalmi Vⁱ, 7: Perdes omnes qui loquntur mendacium, sub hac forma: Multa, inquit, videntur pro salute aut commodo alicuius non malicia, sed benignitate mendacia: quale fuit illarum obstetricum in Exodo que Pharaoni falsum renunciaverunt, ut infantes filiorum Israel non necarentur, sed eciam ista non in re, sed in dolo laudantur. Et hic notant allegantes hanc formam verborum quomodo aliquis est pius dolus quo licet nobis proximum menciendo decipere. Sed ego respexi multos libros Augustini in quibus dicit concorditer quod iste obstetrices in isto mendacio peccaverunt, licet peccatum fuerit Hebreis proficuum, unde cum nullum bonum sit irremuneratum, Deus pro pietate quam habuerant fecit eas taliter premiari. Unde Magister Historiarum super Exodi cap. III° quod sic incipit: De indole obstetricum, sic loquitur: Quia timuerunt Deum, edificavit illis domos, id est, locupletavit eas, cum essent pauperes, vel fecundavit eas, cum essent steriles. Augustinus vero dicit obstetrices venialiter peccasse, Gregorius vero videtur velle quod mortaliter; dicit enim quod merces benignitatis earum non potuit in eterna vita retribui, sed pro culpa mendacii in terrenam compensacionem declinata est.

As to those two pieces of evidenceevidencia: evidence, that we ought to have lied against our oath, so pious and lawful, before the council of our king, I call God and the divine powers to witness that among all the doctrinesdoctrina: doctrine or counsels I have heard none has met me harder or more detestable.6 Therefore it seems to me that it could have been said less badly in private than thus publicly in the schools; for one lying thus would manifestly have incurred perjury and the infamy which he was avoiding, and so would culpably have inferredconcludere: to infer, according to the goal of refutationredarguere: to refute, chiefly against himself.7 Therefore it is less evil, without damage to the soul, patiently to suffer detractions and scandals, than, by lying and consequently wronging the whole created universe, to offend the lord of truth. For no case can be imagined, nor fictionficticia: fiction found, in which it is lawful to lie; rather, as lying grows, even among the clergyclerus; clericus: the clergy; cleric, more than usual, it would be the doctor’s work to bring forth from the treasury of scripture reasons and testimonies of the saints in detestation of lying, and not to foster lying with lies of allegation and with sophistical arguments.8 I for my part would shudder to bring in this school as a doctor of lying, since from frailty we are all too prone to it without being led further astray by a foreign science of lying; and so a doctor teaching that it is lawful to lie proceeds imperfectly unless he teaches how it is lawful to lie, and consequently unless he teaches how we ought to lie; and so, according to the school of lying, it would be praiseworthy to lie by falsely feigning foreign doctors 163and sayings of holy doctors, to give colour to this teachingsentencia: CONTEXTUAL: teaching / sentence.9 But who would believe such a school? And I say "with lies of allegation" because the saying of Augustine on that [verse] of Psalm 5:7, "Thou wilt destroy all that speak a lie", was alleged against me in this form: "Many lies," he says, "seem [to be told] for someone’s safety or advantage, not from malice but from kindness: such was that of the midwives in Exodus, who reported what was false to Pharaoh, so that the infants of the sons of Israel should not be killed; but even these are praised not in the thing but in the guile."10 And here those who allege this form of words note how there is a pious guile by which it is lawful for us to deceive our neighbour by lying. But I have looked into many books of Augustine in which he says consistently that those midwives sinned in that lie, although the sin was profitable to the Hebrews; hence, since no good is unrewarded, God, for the piety which they had, caused them to be rewarded in such a way.11 Hence the Master of the Histories, on Exodus, chapter 3, which begins thus, "On the promise of the midwives", speaks thus: "Because they feared God, he built them houses, that is, he enriched them, since they were poor, or made them fruitful, since they were barren." Augustine indeed says that the midwives sinned venially, but Gregory seems to hold that [they sinned] mortally; for he says that the reward of their kindness could not be repaid in eternal life, but because of the fault of lying was turned aside into an earthly recompense.12

Notes

  1. 1 Deus virtute supra genus est taliter virtuosus: we take virtute supra genus together, "by a virtue above every genus"; it may also be read "God, above genus, is by virtue so virtuous". The argument runs from the opponents’ premiss (a lie can be a virtue) through the exemplarism of the virtues in God.
  2. 2 A A₁ lack II. (161.10), apparently of IIª Corinthiorum. Ps. 84:9 (Ps. 85:8 in the Hebrew numbering) and 2 Cor. 13:3 are quoted in the Douay–Rheims. Fistula: the pipe through which the player speaks, the creature as God’s instrument.
  3. 3 Cum veris: so the codices (Loserth, 161.12): "together with true [premisses]". Distrahens: "virtuous" does not take away from "lie" as "dead" takes away from "man", so a virtuous lie is a lie without qualification. A margin Arguitur quod Deus non potest mentiri (161.20). John 8:44 DR "he is a liar, and the father thereof"; Wyclif’s ut pater eius turns the verse on God, and we give it in the DR wording.
  4. 4 B lacks sit (161.22). A reads Cor. I, A₁ I Cor. I (161.25); 2 Cor. 1:17 DR "It is, and It is not". In verbo: we take it as the Word, the Son, in whom the angels see the truth; "in speech" is possible. The codices read Thymotei II (161.28); 2 Tim. 2:13 DR. Cateclismus: cataclysm, a deluge; Loserth’s side-note (161.26) gives "fall to pieces".
  5. 5 B margin, another hand: Misericors est Deus infinite, sed finite est miserator (162.5). Miserator: one who shows mercy in act, as against the infinite attribute.
  6. 6 Wyclif counts himself among the sworn doctors (debuissemus, "we"; see 08-a, n. 7). B margin, another hand, Jurat, "he swears" (162.8). Deum contestor et numina: an oath formula; numina, "the divine powers", is Wyclif’s word.
  7. 7 Ad partem: in private. Secundum metam redargucionis: the goals (metae) of the sophistical arguer as set out in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi 3 (165b12–22), of which refutation is the first. The liar refutes himself, incurring the perjury and infamy he lied to avoid. A margin Conclusio (162.17).
  8. 8 B margin, another hand, Nota de non committendo mendacio (162.20). A thezauro (162.23), a spelling. Mendaciis allegacionum: lies in the citing of authorities (allegacio, the alleging of a text), as the next sentences show.
  9. 9 Sine abduccione peregrina: without being led astray by something alien, the "science of lying". Coloranda: "to give colour to", the verb beside the glossary color (a plausible ground), not "to disguise".
  10. 10 A margin Augustinus. Nota. Pro mendacio obstitricum in Exodo et contra; B margin, another hand, De obstetricum mendacio (163.4). Augustine, Enarr. in Ps. 5 (PL 36:85; Loserth: Opp. IV, p. 18), which has the non and indole. The codices lack non before malicia (163.9); Loserth supplies it from Augustine, and it is translated. Loserth gives Augustine’s words as Sed etiam ista non re, sed indole laudantur (163.10): the opponents’ non in re, sed in dolo is the reading Wyclif contests at 164.1–12. The midwives: Exod. 1:15–19 (cited).
  11. 11 "Many books of Augustine": e.g. Contra mendacium 15.31–32 (PL 40:539–40), De mendacio (PL 40:491–92), Quaest. in Hept. II.1 (PL 34:597, potuit non ad laudem, sed ad veniam pertinere).
  12. 12 Exodi cap. III°: the codices have a lacuna, and Loserth supplies the chapter from Peter Comestor, Historia scholastica, Exod. 3 (163.19; he cites the Strassburg edition of 1515; PL 198:1142B–C, De dolo obstetricum). Loserth notes that in Comestor one reads de dolo, not de indole (163.20), which bears on Wyclif’s argument at 164.3. A margin Magister historiarum (163.19). "He built them houses": Exod. 1:21 DR. Gregory: Moralia XVIII.3 (PL 76:41A–B; Loserth: Opp. I, p. 559): the midwives’ reward in terrenam … recompensationem declinata; Comestor himself reports Augustine (venialiter) and Gregory (mortaliter). Where Comestor’s words end is not marked; we close the quotation after "barren" and take the report of Augustine and Gregory as Wyclif’s, though it may continue Comestor.
How the Latin of this chapter was established
  • Plate readings; page · reading · note):
    • 161: oportet (151a folio mark, C margin letter)
    • 161: Deum
    • 161: esse
    • 161: est (short ascender with crossbar = t)
    • 161: in (10 is the line number)
    • 161: IIª
    • 161: Christus
    • 161: Christus
    • 161: IIª
    • 161: IIª
    • 161: 13
    • 162: ∅ (debuisse-/mus is one word, already whole at pos 39)
    • 162: regis
    • 163: Vⁱ (superscript i after V (Psalmi Vⁱ, 7))
    • 163: III°
    • 163: Quia
    • 161: decepisse